A Better Way

Finding a better way to get things done, a technical journey

Archive for February, 2010

Wacom Bamboo Tablet Experience

Feb 18

Posted by Jack Lawson in Development, General, Prototyping, User Interface Design, Web Design | No Comments


My awesome first tablet design

My awesome first tablet design

(This post was started using my new tablet!)

Well, I suppose that now that I have a tablet, I oughta start practicing. You see, I’ve never been one to have exceptional handwriting skills, so it’s a good thing that I now have a computer that can understand my handwriting better than my 8th-grade Spanish teacher could. I used to get a LOT of zeros on my homework.

(At this point, I’m back to my keyboard because my hand began cramping up. I tried, at least… Typing at 90WPM  on my keyboard is superior to writing using a plastic pen on a mat.)

I’ve long dreamed of owning a graphics tablet, for quick mockups (I included my first here. Creative Commons license, feel free to derive from its awesomeness.) I picked up the Wacom Pen & Touch. Three days in, it has been fun to play with; while it hasn’t been 100% everything that I ever imagined it would be, I think that it may be more of a learning curve issue rather than an issue with the technology itself. I’m used to using a mouse that I have to throw all over a mousepad, not a pen and a tablet that maps 1:1 with my monitor (originally, it mapped to both monitors before I turned off the second monitor in the tablet settings.)

One of the troubles I was having was that it seemed somewhat laggy when I was using my pen on Windows 7 with Photoshop CS3. I noticed mostly that when I was writing, I couldn’t add small details well (look at how crazy all of the lines in my As are); it would sort of stick and think it was supposed to pull up some kind of command menu. I’d like to blame it on myself, as a user error… but it isn’t at all obvious how I fix that issue, if it is one.

Regardless, I’m going to soldier on and try a few more mockups before passing more severe judgement. There are probably some hidden settings somewhere to fix; and once I have those figured out, I’ll post a follow-up on how I did it. Hopefully I do it. Don’t crush my dreams, Wacom.

Tags: , ,

jQuery 1.4.2 updates, and the release of jQuery UI 1.8rc2

Feb 16

Posted by Jack Lawson in Development, JQuery, Javascript | No Comments

jQuery 1.4.2 is out- not officially on their website, but you can be sneaky and get it here:

http://code.jquery.com/jquery-1.4.2.js

http://code.jquery.com/jquery-1.4.2.min.js (not really “minified” as much as “closure compiled”… can we get a verb for that?) The changelog isn’t up yet, but that’s generally the last thing to go (and hey, we snuck in the back door to grab the update anyway, right?) I imagine it’ll eventually find it’s way to their API page for 1.4.2.  I ran a quick diff; here’s some changes that I found notable from jQuery 1.4.1 to 1.4.2:

  • Optimizations for the body selector
  • A few changes to how arrays of elements selected are built, I’ll go with my gut and say that they’re optimizations too
  • Trimming whitespace from JSON data responses, for good ol’ IE
  • A more few various bugfixy-looking things, mostly targeting IE
  • It looks like there was a lot done to the event-adding code; I think mostly internal changes. Probably more optimizations? I’ll leave it to Resig or someone to explain whenever the changelog comes out. A few (generally pretty deep) methods had some parameters changed, or were renamed (things like “jQuery.event.special.submit.remove” becoming “jQuery.event.special.submit.teardown”)
  • A smattering of changes within “live” and “die” mostly centering around the usage of namespaces
  • Blackberry browser bugfix concerning converting NodeLists to arrays
  • jQuery.getText changed to jQuery.text
  • Changes to caching fragments to help out WebKit and IE 6

I haven’t really dug too deeply in the jQuery core before, so I’m not totally qualified to give a whole lot more detail than that. I used SourceGear Diffmerge between 1.4.1 and 1.4.2 to find out what I found out.

Also, in related (and perhaps more official news),  the jQuery UI team released jQuery UI 1.8rc2 – which includes bugfixes in the already pretty stable 1.8rc1 (changelog). You can grab it:

http://jquery-ui.googlecode.com/files/jquery-ui-1.8rc2.zip (development bundle)

http://labs.crimsondeviations.com/jquery-ui-1.8rc2-min.js (I threw it into a closure compiler, it seems the dev package doesn’t include a “minified” version.)

As of right now, I’m testing it in our application at MeM. Let’s see how things go!

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Tags: , , , , ,

ASP.NET Controls, How I Hate Them

Feb 8

Posted by Jack Lawson in ASP.NET, Development, General, IIS and Windows Technologies, JQuery, PHP | 3 Comments

MSDN Error
Image by ttrentham via Flickr

I’ve always, for some reason, felt innately that PHP allowed me more control over my code than ASP.NET. My brain kept saying “but .NET is more organized! It compiles! It’s faster! It’s easier to write,” but my mind kept saying “PHP lets me do what I want how I want it… screw .NET!”

What I finally figured out was that I love C#, I even like the .NET framework, but I hate is, in fact, ASP.NET.

Every time I see an example of simple, elegant code, the most complex control on the page is a label or a panel. While the intentions behind FormView may be good, writing my own forms and hooking them up saves hundreds of lines (literally- I just refactored almost 800 lines of code into 150 by removing a formview) as well as reduces complexity and maintenance (now I no longer have to maintain view and edit and whatever other modes FormView has.) ASP.NET perhaps made sense in a day before OO principles and ORMs came into play; the controls were written for the same kind of people that use the drag-and-drop design mode. Easy to slap down haphazardly, not so easy to maintain.

We replaced every ASP.NET Ajax control we used anywhere (after I evangelized it, to my chagrin) with jQuery after about 6 months of use; while the controls did what we needed on the surface, underneath there was always some caveat, like the linked DropDowns needed web services, or the datepicker control had missing options… there was always something somewhere that I needed a bit of flexibility on that just wasn’t there, or was buggy. It seemed very odd for it to be out of beta in such a state. So, I ended up starting my own control library using jQuery, and now it’s easily extensible, easy to modify from the client, and I can control the markup.

Oh, and the markup… don’t get me started on the markup. Tables for everything. I can’t rearrange the otherwise useful Wizard control because it’s so static in its display.

So, I guess the point I’m trying to make is, that the longer I use .NET, the less and less I use the complex controls and the more I roll my own. Because it’s easier.
Kind of ironic.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Tags: , , , , , , , ,